Comparisons

You have probably already tried the alternatives.

Every developer who finds Glia Guru has already tried something else. Here is how the approaches differ.

Glia Guru vs. manual context files

Your CLAUDE.md is already wrong.

You open your editor. The first thing you do is check whether the context file is current. It is not. The feature you shipped yesterday is not mentioned. The architecture decision you made on Tuesday is not reflected. So you spend 15 minutes updating a markdown file that your AI assistant will read once and then forget by the next session.

This is the workflow that every developer using AI coding tools has accepted as normal. Write the context file. Forget to update it. Watch the AI make wrong assumptions. Fix the assumptions. Update the file. Repeat.

Glia Guru reads your vault. It knows which tasks are open, which architecture notes you updated yesterday, and what you shipped last week. It generates a fresh CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, and tool-specific prompt files from your actual project state. When your project evolves, the context files update automatically. You never write CLAUDE.md by hand again.

Manual context files Glia Guru
Source of truth Your memory Your vault
Update frequency When you remember Automatic on vault change
Coverage The project you are working on right now All projects in your vault
Time cost 10-20 minutes per session Zero
Accuracy after 48 hours Degraded Current
Supported tools Whatever format you write Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, GPT, Gemini
Glia Guru vs. project management tools

Your vault already has the project state. Why maintain it twice?

You adopt Linear because your vault's task management is invisible to everyone except you. Now you have two systems: the vault where the real work happens, and Linear where the tickets live. Every morning you spend 10 minutes making sure they agree. They never quite do.

The same pattern applies to Notion, Jira, Trello, and every other tool that maintains its own database. The moment you adopt one, you create a synchronisation problem. Your vault drifts from the tool. The tool drifts from reality. You are the sync engine.

Glia Guru does not maintain its own database of your tasks. It reads your vault's markdown files and surfaces the state visually: timeline, board, and list views pulled from your existing frontmatter. Changes you make in the dashboard write back to your vault as markdown frontmatter. One source of truth. Your Supabase account stores the sync state and dashboard configuration; the task data lives in your vault, where it always has.

PM tools (Linear, Notion, Jira) Glia Guru
Data location Their servers Your vault + your Supabase
Migration required Yes (import your tasks) No (reads your existing vault)
Two sources of truth Yes (tool + vault) No (vault only)
Cross-project visibility Per-workspace All projects in one vault
AI context generation No Automatic
What happens when you stop paying Export and hope Your vault is unchanged
Glia Guru vs. Obsidian plugins

Plugins handle files. Guru handles projects.

The Obsidian plugin ecosystem is extraordinary. Tasks, Dataview, Projects, Kanban — each solves a specific problem within a single vault view. But none of them give you a cross-project dashboard. None generate AI context files. And none sync your project state to a database that a web dashboard or mobile app can read.

If you manage one project in one vault, plugins are often enough. The moment you manage multiple projects across machines, you are stitching together views from multiple plugins and hoping they agree.

Glia Guru is not a plugin. It is a standalone application that reads your vault externally, syncs the project state to your own Supabase account, and provides a visual dashboard that works on any device. Your vault structure stays the same. Your plugins keep working. Guru adds a layer on top — the AI context engine, the visual planner, and the cross-project dashboard sit outside Obsidian's plugin architecture by design.

Obsidian plugins Glia Guru
Architecture Inside Obsidian Standalone app + your vault
Cross-project view Limited Full dashboard
AI context generation No Automatic
Multi-device access Obsidian on each device Web dashboard anywhere
Database layer None (file-only) Your Supabase account
Works alongside plugins N/A Yes (reads vault, does not modify plugin data)

Already done with the alternatives?

Currently onboarding the first 100 vaults.

Request Early Vault Access